Thursday, June 9, 2011

funny owl

funny owl. A cat and an owl !
  • A cat and an owl !



  • pal351
    05-27 04:35 PM
    I called and my employer called them. they said case is ending no further info. is available.

    thanks for replys.





    funny owl. owl - Random Funny Pics
  • owl - Random Funny Pics



  • chandler_vt
    04-30 08:17 AM
    Where did you get this info? Could you please point out a reference that says so?

    You have to think about it in these terms.

    1) Say you show the experience. Then it means you were working in US while being on h4. It doesn't matter if you received salary here or not. Like say if some VP of infosys comes to US for a meeting, he is getting his salary in India. But he is here on proper visa to do his work.

    2) On the other hand, h4 prevents you from doing any kind of work while in US. Although u may still be employee of a company in other country, you CAN't work. Simple.

    Someone mentioned a British citizen gets paid in pounds while she works in Cali. See my example of Infosys VP. Its important to know which visa she has. I m sure she won't be on H4.





    funny owl. funny owl
  • funny owl



  • fromnaija
    06-23 02:05 AM
    Reading the SOP on I-485 processing, I found that the application is stamped with the receipt date in the mail room. When the package is eventually opened the receipt date is compared with the visa bulletin as of that receipt date and if PD is not current the application is rejected.

    Yeah, its not worth the risk. Just curious about how this timeline works though.





    funny owl. Post
  • Post



  • sanjay
    08-29 12:29 PM
    I saw many 2nd July Polls but doesn't have full proof information.
    So thaught creating New Poll.
    Hope everyone will participate in the Poll.


    where is the poll? Any way there more than 5 - 6 polls as of now and there is no way to find a full proof information. We all do more speculations and analysis. So, no need to create new threads with these polls. We got many.



    more...


    funny owl. funny-owl-vector.jpg
  • funny-owl-vector.jpg



  • duncanidaho
    02-01 05:48 AM
    There is a seperate thread on this. Look it up.
    My 2 c:
    - Stay away from Murthy. They've screwed up at least 2 cases that I know of. And their response is slow.
    - Thomas Fan in MD: Run like you've seen the devil. I have no idea why malpractice suits has not been filed against him yet.
    - Clark Trevor in CA - Guy is awesome but expensive.
    - Ellen Krengel in CA - Decent.
    - Gowda in MI - Slow, inefficient.
    - Rajeev Khanna - seems to be good, efficient and responsive.
    - Jon Wu, CA - Slow as hell but knows the ins/outs





    funny owl. funny owl. the owls (treasure. Thunderhawks. May 2, 01:16 PM. But what does Consumer Reports say about the network connection of this phone?
  • funny owl. the owls (treasure. Thunderhawks. May 2, 01:16 PM. But what does Consumer Reports say about the network connection of this phone?



  • chanduv23
    11-09 08:16 AM
    Did someone say beer? If you guys will bring in chips and salsa, I will get beer. Let me know if you decide for 7ish on Friday. Will be there.

    Cheers,

    Cool - lets have a theme for the party and we can all wear clothes based on that theme. How about ramayana?
    Obama - Rama
    Michelle - Sita
    Sasha and malia - lava and kusa
    biden - lakshmana

    one of us will be ravana, kumbakarna .....

    with beer chips and salsa - I would also recommend shish kebabs with spicy chutney and offocurse onion and mirchi bhajjis

    and some champagne - because they may make an announcement "Best costume winners will get a green card"



    more...


    funny owl. Funny Owl | Funny Blog - Funny
  • Funny Owl | Funny Blog - Funny



  • dbevis
    March 3rd, 2004, 07:22 PM
    Very cool. Gets the Vertigo award from me. That has to be the tallest spiral staircase I've ever seen. They don't design em like that much over here - probably to minimize the possibility of jumpers.





    funny owl. Funny Owl Picture
  • Funny Owl Picture



  • GlobalCitizen
    08-21 03:40 PM
    I have the similar situation, worrying about not getting receipt before expiration date. I called USCIS, the lady told me that as long as I filed before the expiration day, I'm okay to work. If someone else could call USCIS, get different people answer this question, and confirm this, that will be helpful.

    What number Would I call? 1-800-375-5283 is just messages



    more...


    funny owl. FUNNY OWL. Jolly Giant. Apr 24, 08:24 AM
  • FUNNY OWL. Jolly Giant. Apr 24, 08:24 AM



  • nixstor
    08-23 12:16 PM
    I see a lot of people flocking into "Orkut". How about incorporating a dose of IV through orkut if some of us are already there? What is more important is, making people aware of the consequences they might have to face, even if they havent filed for their GC yet.





    funny owl. Funny owl in a trance
  • Funny owl in a trance



  • isthereawayout
    02-22 12:42 PM
    Yes, in my case we wouldn't be using the experience gained with the current employer as I already have the required 1 year experience before joining the employer.

    My fear is that DOL/USCIS would come back and say hey you have almost the same requirement for both the positions, why does one require only MS+1 while the other accepts BS+3..



    more...


    funny owl. FUNNY OWL. LeoNobilis. Oct 6, 04:54 PM. 3.5quot;, or even 4quot; - is too small for
  • FUNNY OWL. LeoNobilis. Oct 6, 04:54 PM. 3.5quot;, or even 4quot; - is too small for



  • bobbydalal
    09-22 03:46 PM
    Guys forget what we think on the HR5882. iF WE ALL GET TOGETHER AND PRAY ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE. So lets stop being negative in our approcah and just say yes it will and keep calling and praying yaar.





    funny owl. Tried to make u rate stars if
  • Tried to make u rate stars if



  • mmk123
    04-26 11:06 PM
    Many of us came here because an American University admitted us and sent us invitation (aka I20) to attend the program and many are working here because american companies invited us and sponsored our work documents and pays us very well at par with other knowledge workers. The company and industry we work in, needs our skills (even in this recession) and that's why we are here.

    Believe me, most of us won't let GC situation drive our lives and will succeed no matter where we will be and will make sure to be helpful and grateful to all people and the country we are in. May be it's India or US or Canada or else ...



    more...


    funny owl. Another Funny Owl Face
  • Another Funny Owl Face



  • a_paradkar
    08-08 07:45 AM
    Pamposh:

    I am in the same boat. Is there anyway of figuring out whether USCIS Vermont recevied and Fwd to TSC / NSC?


    What is your back up plan





    funny owl. The OWL THREAD
  • The OWL THREAD



  • shreekhand
    07-16 03:01 PM
    BTW....one can now apply directly to NSC or TSC as per the state they are applying from. This memo became effective June 21 and is mandatory starting July 30.

    see http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/UpdateDirectFiling062107.pdf

    So there is now a choice till July 30 for everybody's kind information!



    more...


    funny owl. funny bird, funny owl,
  • funny bird, funny owl,



  • Administrator2
    04-29 09:38 AM
    There are 26 pages in this document and half page for legal EB immigrants.

    Pros
    1.GC for MS in STEM
    2.Per country limits removed

    Cons
    1.No increase in number of EBs
    2.Now all counties will be backloged instead of just I and C. ( Misery loves company)

    We disagree with your assertion that all countries will be backlogged. IV has advocated for removal of per-country limits measure for a very long time because we believe that removal of per country limits is essential for fixing the existing backlog and preventing future backlogs

    We have publically listed removal of per country limits as our key objective. While we welcome the participation of everyone, if you disagree with us, you are welcome to use other resources available to you.





    funny owl. funny owl photoshop
  • funny owl photoshop



  • saketkapur
    12-02 06:58 PM
    This in from Ron Gotcher website....I guess they are reading our letters.....


    Good news concerning AOS denials based on I-140 revocations

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We received some very good news over the weekend. In October and November, our office was contacted by a number of adjustment of status applicants who had received denials based on "revocations" of their approved I-140 petitions by former employers. All of these applicants had AOS applications that had been pending for more than 180 days before they left their sponsoring employers. They also had approved I-140 petitions. Nonetheless, vindictive employers in each case attempted to revoke the approved I-140 petitions. The CIS accepted these "revocations" and promptly denied the AOS applications. We were contacted by six different individuals with these types of cases and we filed motions to reconsider in their cases.

    Earlier, in September, we handled this type of case and the MTR was granted and the denial successfully reversed. This happened before any of these October/November cases came in or were filed.

    I was disappointed to see that the CIS was still attempting to deny cases on this basis. There is absolutely no law to support this type of denial and, in fact, such denials are directly contrary to both statutory law and explicit CIS policy.

    I was gratified to see that all six of the MTRs we field in October/November were granted and the denials reversed. I am also encouraged that the CIS accepted our request to reopen the denials of the dependents as well, on their own motion, and spare the pricipal applicants the cost of paying filing fees for MTRs for the denials of dependents' AOS applications.

    I hope this means that the supervisors at the service centers involved are now aware of the blatant illegality of these types of denials and will put and end to them in the future. We can only hope that we have seen an end to this nonsense.
    __________________



    more...


    funny owl. hahahahaha funny owl attacked
  • hahahahaha funny owl attacked



  • tnite
    09-12 03:23 PM
    Where do guys see the LUD? And what number do you call the USCIS on? Thanx.


    Register in USCIS.gov and then enter the I140 info in your portfolio and you will see the LUD(last updated date)
    18003755283
    and then press 12126





    funny owl. Funny owl
  • Funny owl



  • MatsP
    June 2nd, 2006, 10:23 AM
    Thanks, your reply really helped me understand a few things. First of all, for the money I can spend there isn't much of a choice (meaning what I already picked is fine for the money spent), then, even more important fact I realized is that the equipment I can afford for now, can be a starting point in my photography experience. It is more important that I use it, take photos and practice than to own expensive gear and never really use it. In the end I hope that one day in the future when I gain the needed skill I'll be able to afford a better and a more advanced equipment. So, once again, thanks a lot.

    Yes, and of course, by using one type of equipment you also learn what you ACTUALLY need later on.

    By the way, if money is tight, buying used equipment CAN be a way to save money - but of course, you get less warranty and if it breaks after 3-6 months, it's probably going to cost you the same again - which is fine if it was a real bargain, but if you paid only a little less than new-price, it's not... Lenses don't often break, but you never know if you get a Lemon...

    --
    Mats





    funny owl. Funny Owl Vector
  • Funny Owl Vector



  • chanduv23
    06-08 07:20 AM
    I have a NY lisence and it says on top "Temp visitor, expires 05/29/2010" which is the date on my i 94. So around that time I have to go get that extended to whatever temporary date my status gets extended. What a pain.





    sudhakar226
    10-10 04:34 PM
    Hi Ps57002 good to see you here.
    I saw you in . I was h12GC in .

    My case also similar:

    PERM Applied - 04/24/2007 - EB3.
    Perm Approved - 08/14/2007.
    I-140 E-filed - 08/16/2007. Got Online Receipt. Sent the required Documents to USCIS after a week.
    I-485/EAD/AP - Posted on 08/16/2007. Included the Online Labor Approval Petition without signatures and Online receipt of I-140.
    Received USCIS on 08/17/2007.
    Waiting for Receipts.
    Don't know whether it will be accepted or will get an RFE.
    Hey keep me posted on your status.
    I can be reached at sudhakar226@yahoo.com or 862-754-8326.
    Good Luck.





    neoklaus
    10-21 09:42 AM
    I am working on H1B. Recently what has happened that my family lives in state A, and I am working in state B. My family could not move to state B because my sone is going to school. I have to pay alot of expenses to go back and fort from state B to A, like air ticket and cab ect. I talking to my compnay regarding this and they said that whatever are my expenses submit to every month end and he will send a check for those expenses which will be pre taxed amount. i.e. if my pre taxed salary is $ 5000 per-month , if I submit expense statemet for $500. Then my employer will send a check of 500 and paystub i.e. direct deposit after applying tax on $4500.

    I am not sure whatever he is suggesting is good tyhing to do and it will not have any problem for me.

    If you made a correct explanation then: 1. You will end up with $4500- of wages PLUS $500 of reimbursable expenses. Therefore only $4500 will be taxed.
    You should to make sure that in your Form W2 ( 1. Wages, tips, other compensation)for 2008 these $500 will not be shown: reason- you will be taxed only on $4500 but your income will be higher so you will may end up with additional taxes owned- that depends on you Income).

    That scenario is OK if your total salary is not an issue for you.

    For you Employer paying to you $4500 Plus $500( reimbursable) is much better
    cause he will pay company taxes only on that $4500 and not on $500.

    There could be other ways to resolve this problem. Depends on your employer
    willingness.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment