Tuesday, June 7, 2011

nike football boots mercurials

nike football boots mercurials. THE NIKE MERCURIAL
  • THE NIKE MERCURIAL



  • kumar1
    01-15 09:55 AM
    Interesting article! It reminds me of 2001-2002 time when getting labor approved was extremely difficult. It was tough for companies to prove that there is no willing and qualified US citizen in IT field to do the job. We saw so many labors getting rejected that time. Well, it is all coming back to haunt us.





    nike football boots mercurials. The Nike Mercurial Vapor Super
  • The Nike Mercurial Vapor Super



  • waitforgc1
    04-07 06:20 PM
    Thats a little strange, as employers now a days are suggesting to use EAD instead
    of H1's as the extentions itself has problems. And based on what i know its
    ok to be on EAD instead of h1. Either way there is not much difference.





    nike football boots mercurials. Nike Mercurial SL
  • Nike Mercurial SL



  • desi3933
    07-05 03:14 PM
    Hi All,
    Please clarify my doubts if you can.

    The G-325A form is asking for dates of previous employment. I have an issue here.....

    I did an L1 to H1 transfer in 2005. My L1 was valid till APRIL 2006. So my intention was to work with L1 employer till April 2006 and then switch to H1 employer.

    H1 employer also applied for a change of status, I was not aware of the whole status issue that time. I asked the H1 company's lawyer whether I could continue with my L1 employer after getting the H1 and she said it's fine.

    So I got the H1B approval in Oct 2005, but still continued with L1 employer till APRIL 2006, then switched to H1.

    Recently I came to know that this could be an issue. When I was filling the G-325A form, I wondered if I specify that I worked with the L1 employer till APRIL 2006, would they catch this?? Even if they catch , how big an issue would this be??

    If I put the dates to reflect the dates to show that I quit my L1 employer in Oct 2005 itself, would this be an issue?? I guess in this case, if by any chance they ask for any further evidence like pay stubs or W2 in that period of time, I would be in trouble.

    Any advice is appreciated. I'm afraid to talk about this to my current company attorney....

    Thanks.

    Did you get new I-94 with H1 transfer?
    Any re-entry in USA after that?


    ___________________
    Not a legal advice.





    nike football boots mercurials. Nike Football Boots Kids
  • Nike Football Boots Kids



  • ssksubash
    09-29 03:47 PM
    HI,

    My company filed my Perm on Jun 4th 08 but it is not yet approved. My H1B is in its 6th year and will end in July 09. I was wondering if I would get an extension , even if my Perm gets denied for some reason.

    I just want to prepare for the worst case. Can any one please help with some information.

    What are my options to get a H1B extension.

    Thank you,



    more...


    nike football boots mercurials. football boots nike mercurial
  • football boots nike mercurial



  • zoozee
    06-11 05:56 PM
    Mistake..............Now i am not able to change the title-sorry guys.





    nike football boots mercurials. Football Boots Nike Mercurial.
  • Football Boots Nike Mercurial.



  • johnggberg
    07-18 10:48 AM
    i verified with my lawyer, and they did not got it yet, hence i'm hoping its still with USCIS.

    if they returned it, i guess we can still file when ever we get it back, even after aug 17th. as it is returned for wrong reasons



    more...


    nike football boots mercurials. The Nike Mercurial Superfly II
  • The Nike Mercurial Superfly II



  • milind70
    10-15 10:45 AM
    Hello Gurus,
    I am EB3 India with PD September 2002.

    After all these years of endless waiting I am called for
    an interview at the local office in Philadelphia
    in Nov 26th 2007.

    Here are my details:
    Labour Applied: September 2002
    Labour approved: September 2003
    I-140/I-485 Applied: April 2004
    I-140 Pproved: August 2004
    Got married: August 2005
    Applied I-485 for Wife: June 2007
    Current Status of Wife: H1-B
    Countelss EADs and APs for me and a recent EAD approval
    for my wife with her AP still pending and status is still H1-B.

    In the beginning of this year, I resigned from the
    company who was the original sponsorer of my GC.
    I then started contracting on hourly basis and worked for
    a decent hourly rate for the first half of this year.
    Finally I got a full time offer with decent salary and
    benefits and took the job. I started working for this
    job - remotely and also took up another contracting job
    on an hourly basis (Got greedy as I waited too long :-))
    and started working on both these jobs.
    The point is - it is a different technology and not even
    remotely connected to my original job where my Labour
    cert was applied and approved. I was a developer
    back then and with all the experience, I couldn't
    continue as the pay was too low and no growth at all.

    I can have a letter of future employment that
    states that I have on offer in the same technology
    in which my original labour was applied and approved
    and that is not a problem at all.

    Please advise me on how to go about it. I can
    afford to pay and take the best attorney with me
    to the interview - some one who is very well known in
    the Philadelphia area.

    Any inputs/advise are really appreciated.

    IMP: Icing on the cake - my PD was mentioned wrong in
    the interview notice - it says april 2004 !!
    That was when my i-140 was applied and not labour.
    My labour was applied in September 2002 !!!
    Advise on this is also appreciated.

    Thanks a lot.

    I think you should be fine, just be confident dont waiver in interview.
    Stick to what is on paper.
    Regarding your PD it is of utmost importance that you get it corrected now
    than later, I had a friend who had a PD of May 2001 but his PD was detrmined to be may 2004 his attorney raised a query and got it corrected.
    I think in your case because have put your 140 date as PD since PD is usually determined at 140 stage and u have filed concurrently,make sure you bring this upto the notice of USCIS and get it corrected .





    nike football boots mercurials. Nike Mercurial SL 1
  • Nike Mercurial SL 1



  • kaisersose
    07-18 03:26 PM
    1. Can we use AC21 provision without EAD card ?
    2. My H1 expires in Jan 2008. Do I need to have EAD card before that ?
    3. Can we apply for EAD later, after you have filed 485 and AP? If so do we need any reciept of 485 application?

    1. Can we use AC21 provision without EAD card ?

    Answer: Sure, you can. In fact, that is the advised approach. Do not fall back on EAD unless absolutely necessary.

    2. My H1 expires in Jan 2008. Do I need to have EAD card before that ?

    Yes, If you wish to work on EAD then you need to have it by Jan 2008. Unless the interim EAD option is bought back, I doubt if any July filer will have an EAD by January 2008. I would suggest you be prepared to extend your H-1b.

    3. Can we apply for EAD later, after you have filed 485 and AP? If so do we need any reciept of 485 application?

    Answer: Yes. You can do it yourself, but you will need evidence to show that a 485 has been applied.



    more...


    nike football boots mercurials. A popular feature of the Nike
  • A popular feature of the Nike



  • indo_obama
    05-12 11:45 AM
    Wow didnt know everybody here are Super Immigrants....... legal ...Illegal and now super..... whats next duper immigrants





    nike football boots mercurials. football boots nike mercurial
  • football boots nike mercurial



  • bondgoli007
    09-29 07:57 PM
    Hi,

    Don't fret about the PERM time lines. It can take anywhere from 1 month to more than 6 months (for Fragomen clients) for PERM approvals/denials. Mine was filed in May and I also had to reply to an audit.

    In your case because your PERM was applied more than 365 days before your 6th year H1 expires, even if you PERM approval doesn't come until Jun 09, your employer can file for a 1 year extension.

    Now, I am not very sure about this scenario in case of a PERM denial. Maybe someone else can comment on that one.

    Thanks.



    more...


    nike football boots mercurials. The long awaited Nike
  • The long awaited Nike



  • dealsnet
    03-30 12:14 PM
    According to current visa bulletttin, EB2 -INDIA is 15 FEB 04.

    Your profile shows your PD DEC. 2005.
    How you got the GC, when the PD is not current?
    If any mistake, you need to contact USCIS, otherwise they can find out the mistake and revoke any time.
    All:

    I have a question with regard to legal status:

    Case - My current h1, my wife's and son's h4 status will expire within 2 months. My Green Card gets approved today, while my wife and son's stays pending. Since I have the GC, I may not be able to apply for h1 extention.

    (a) What will be the status of my wife and son after the 2 month period?
    (b) How will I be able to keep my wife and son in a legal status, after the 2 month period

    I would appreciate some wisdom here.....





    nike football boots mercurials. Clint#39;s football boots
  • Clint#39;s football boots



  • vikki76
    01-15 10:36 AM
    Hello All,
    My friend's father wants to apply for B-1 visa for tourism purpose. He is a senior retired defence personnel in India and now having successful post-retirement career as a education consultant. Will his Army background prove to be a detriment to his B-1 visa application?
    DS-157 specifically asks for prior military training and knowledge of handling of firearms. All answers are affirmative in his case.
    Does any one know if some one with this profile was able to get B-1/2 visitor visa



    more...


    nike football boots mercurials. Superfly football boots,
  • Superfly football boots,



  • MannyD
    09-07 06:36 PM
    Please respond so that we can get an idea of the distribution of EB cases.
    You have to be logged in to participate in the poll.
    Thanks to MrWaitingGC for the initiative.





    nike football boots mercurials. Nike Football Boots
  • Nike Football Boots



  • amulchandra
    02-06 07:39 PM
    That's really nice. Even I heard a lot of success stories like your's. That's the reason I started approaching non-profit organizations for volunteering. But in may case it is working the other way round. May be because I am in to IT.
    But this episode brought my morale down a little bit because for the first time I felt that I am an alien here.
    Anyway I may have to think twice before approaching for volunteering again.....



    more...


    nike football boots mercurials. football boots nike mercurial.
  • football boots nike mercurial.



  • bp333
    10-29 04:31 PM
    Thanks for your info..and I wish you good luck. By any chance are you aware whether i need to send new fees or old fees? As a precaution I am going to sending the diff amount in a separate check.


    They should be OK with the old fee, however to be safe I would send an extra check to make up the difference for new fee. Explain it in the cover letter and let them decide.





    nike football boots mercurials. Berry football boots - but
  • Berry football boots - but



  • ss_col
    08-13 01:15 PM
    Hi,

    Can you tell me what your lawyer sent to the USCIS. How did he link the approved 140 to the pending 485. Did he fill any form? I am in the same boat. My both 140's are with the same company though.

    Thanks



    more...


    nike football boots mercurials. Nike Total 90
  • Nike Total 90



  • GCeffect
    02-09 02:38 PM
    Because Company C and A have different FED TAX ID. so they are considered as different business......

    I didn't raise any question beacuse both the company was ran under the same roof.

    During the PERM the company C was not mentioned in the form. But was under H1b in that time for company C. After getting the PERM approval from Company A. I move my h1b from company C to company A. But I have something written from Company C that although i was employed by company C, but my payroll was being processed by Company A.

    Pelase response



    If Company A and C are related business entities, why H1-B transfer was needed from C to A.

    >> So even i was working with the company C, my payroll was under Company A.
    When you were getting paycheck from A, did you raise this issue?

    Did you put this information in Employment History for I-485? What was your last entry into USA?

    _______________________
    Not a legal advice.
    US Citizen of Indian Origin





    nike football boots mercurials. New Nike Football Boots 2011
  • New Nike Football Boots 2011



  • marty
    01-09 03:28 PM
    don't u come under refugee category? just like Iraqis?

    No. I was born there but was raised abroad.





    nike football boots mercurials. Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly
  • Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly



  • ramus
    05-31 03:53 PM
    Lets contribrite if we want to get something done..





    Saralayar
    05-21 07:59 PM
    Inspite of telling my lawyer she did the mistake of sending my EAD and AP before 120 day period. EAD filed 121 days prior and AP filed 148 days prior. I have gotten the receipts of both but AP status says that they have requested more information/evidence. I am wondering what additional information they need. Anyone else in this situation ?
    Is it 120 business days or just week days?





    harikris
    05-20 08:09 PM
    President Obama recently mentioned plans for holding a White House meeting to discuss proceeding with immigration reform legislation. And now he is keeping that promise by setting June 8th, just three weeks from now, to hold the meeting. According to Politico: "The meeting will be an opportunity to launch a policy conversation that we hope will be able to start a debate that will take place in Congress later in the year," the official, who asked not to be named, said. Asked if the session would be billed as a summit or a forum, like similar meetings on health care...

    More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/obama-sets-date-for-immigration-reform-white-house-conversation.html)

    After a long period, this piece of news is most welcome. This is precisely what we need - people that really matter are going to take up this issue. Hopefully, they reach some logical conclusion on legal immigrant petitions. All we can do from outside is to influence their discussions/debates by making our views heard.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment